Why Every Surgeon Should Keep a Logbook
Most surgeons maintain a logbook. Because they are told to.
That’s the wrong reason.
A surgical logbook is often treated as an administrative requirement — a record of how many operations we have performed, which procedures we have assisted in, and how many cases we have accumulated over the years. But a good logbook can be much more than that.
Cases come and go. Lessons shouldn’t.
Every operation eventually becomes a line in the past. But what we learn from it doesn’t have to disappear with it. A logbook can capture the things that numbers cannot: What went well?
What didn’t? What did I find difficult? What would I do differently next time? Was there something I had never encountered before? Did I become better at something I struggled with six months ago? Over time, these small observations become a record of something much more important than surgical volume. They become a record of growth.
Stop asking: “How many surgeries have I done?”
Start asking: What did I learn? Where did I struggle? Am I improving?
The number of operations performed is certainly important. Experience matters, and surgical competence cannot be separated from exposure and repetition. But volume alone doesn’t guarantee improvement. Two surgeons can perform the same number of operations and learn very different things from them. The difference is often reflection. A logbook creates a place for that reflection to happen.
And this isn’t just for surgeons. Log the books you read. Your workouts. Your ideas. Your projects. Your mistakes. Anything you are trying to get better at. Because memory is surprisingly unreliable. We tend to remember the big successes and the dramatic failures, while forgetting the hundreds of small lessons in between. Writing them down makes progress visible.
This is my logbook on Notion.
Comments